During my childhood my grandparents all lived within ten miles of us and we saw them frequently. Other relatives on my father’s side almost all lived within driving distance of an hour or two. Most of our friends also lived in close proximity. My mother’s parents had immigrated from Scotland as young adults, which gave us a few contacts with whom communication came through blue, one-piece, folding airmail letters always filled with writing on every square inch. For the few who were not closeby letters and occasional phone calls filled the void along with the last means to maintain continued contacts, Christmas cards.
"send cash" … or "send ash"
Now even our closest relatives are scattered throughout the country and seeing them in person once a year requires dedication and planning. After moving to a different area, having school and college friends also scattered, and spending my career running research studies with participants nationwide and sometimes international, my friends are also scattered. Meeting in person with many people who are important to me is a rare treat. As the patterns of our lives changed, methods of communicating and maintaining relationships have also changed. In place of frequent visits, phone calls, letters, and Christmas card lists, we have texts, email, discussion groups, and social media.
One social media platform, LinkedIn, functions for me mostly as a self-updating electronic Rolodex. The other platform that I use more frequently is Facebook. After declining to join it for a while, I took the leap when the next generation of family began to arrive a decade ago and I learned that baby pictures were most readily available on Facebook. It has become a key means of sharing the little events that make up daily life with distant friends and relatives. After the reality became apparent that Facebook’s business practices show little concern for privacy, honesty, or potential harm from manipulators of their platform, I have still stayed on. Why don’t I show my displeasure by disengaging? The answer is that I value those connections that I maintain through Facebook.
Facebook is still the best place to see pictures that I don’t want to miss.
Some of my relationships are stronger because of Facebook than they would have been under the old methods. For example, when I realized a date was the 100th anniversary of my uncle’s birth, I shared a photo of the view from his vacation cabin. That led to a nice exchange of memories with his three granddaughters, who are some of the people I am closer to because of Facebook than I would have been without it.
Sometimes conversations can form unexpected links as disparate people chime in. An example of this was a thread I posted about my husband’s experiences on a business trip that left him stranded in Copenhagen when a volcano in Iceland erupted. As I recounted in real time the tale of his efforts to get a flight home, Facebook friends from various parts of my life joined the conversation. Opinions ranged from “I would never leave home again” to “He has a great excuse to take a long vacation in Europe. Just tell his boss that nothing is flying across the North Atlantic.” Others had an interest in the atmospheric impact and pattern of the ash cloud. Complications in the story included the need to find a way through the bottleneck to the European mainland from the island that Copenhagen sits on, along with all the other people trying to get from Scandinavia to anywhere else in Europe or beyond. Trains were completely overloaded and disrupted, especially since the French and Italian railway workers were on strike (the Italians decided it was a national emergency and put the strike on hold, but the French did not). One joke in Europe was that Icelanders lost a “c” and mistook Europe asking them to “send cash” for “send ash”, referring to the situation then in the depths of the Great Recession after the Icelandic financial system had gone bust.
Social media has changed our methods of maintaining relationships and provides a valuable function, but we urgently need to find a way to control it rather than having it control us.
Jean, I totally agree with you about the reasons to stay on Facebook. Pictures of, and connections with, family and friends who are scattered “across the universe” (as I titled my story), make it worth tolerating the problematic aspects of the site. I particularly love your story about your husband being stranded by the volcano, and people chiming in with their own views of the situation. Perhaps he could have even found friends who were likewise stranded, and gotten together with them. I once connected with a classmate at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival when we both posted on FB that we were going there. We would have never known that we were both there at the same time if not for FB. As you say, it serves a valuable function AND we need to find a way to control it.
Thanks for your cogent post. I have so “been there” that I could have written most of your post (except for your husband being stranded by the Icelandic volcano)! We stay on Facebook because it’s useful for maintaining contact with far-flung family and friends, all the while regretting the fact the we are being exploited by its very business model.
Last year, in response to a different social media prompt, I asked (https://www.myretrospect.com/stories/black-magic/) whether my Retrospect friends would join me in trying out an alternative social media site called MeWe that doesn’t track you or sell your data. Alas, almost no one was interested. Now I learn that, because it doesn’t track (or block) hate speech or false speech, it has become a haven for conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers. As you say, there’s no good answer—even though we desperately need one.
Jean, I really identified with your reasons for staying on Facebook. I wish I could abandon it in protest of some of its truly awful practices, both in terms of sucking up data and manipulating political discourse and creating divisiveness. FB political posts have hurt some of our family connections. People feel freer to rant there than in person. On the other hand, it is so important to me to see those photos and maintain connections with people I care about. It’s a real dilemma.
Jean, I echo the sentiments already posted by my friends in the comments section. My non-social media-indulging husband teases me for being on FB, but I told him when his sister broke her arm in a bike accident, thanks to a FB post. I try to skim over all the ads (so many these days), and look carefully at the origin of any news item before I read it (more and more good ones are behind pay walls). But it is a great way to stay up with family and the friends who haven’t abandoned it, just as you point out..